Access should move with the person.

Starting a new job should come with the access to do it. Changing jobs should prompt a proper look at what access still makes sense.

A new team member needs to work. A person changing roles needs the right access for the new responsibility. Someone leaving should not retain authority that belonged to the role. These are routine events, and the experience should be dependable.

Make the business event trustworthy

Automation starts with the information it receives. We need agreed sources for identity and role changes, clear ownership of that information, and a way to handle an incomplete or conflicting event.

Speed is useful when the input is reliable. When it is not, the process needs to make the uncertainty visible rather than quietly turn it into a permission decision.

Treat a role change as a change

Adding new access is only part of a move. The team should also evaluate which previous permissions still have a valid purpose. Otherwise, a successful transfer can leave a person carrying the authority of several former jobs.

Some transitions need overlap. Agree on its purpose, owner, and end date. A temporary arrangement should be understandable enough to end without rediscovering why it was created.

Verify the outcome

A completed workflow does not always mean the intended access is in place across every application. I would measure the actual result, including failed changes and cases requiring intervention.

Give support teams enough information to resolve an exception without reconstructing the whole event from separate systems.

Accurate access helps a person do the job they have today.

The direction I would choose is reliable lifecycle automation, clear application ownership, and verification of the result. That improves both security and the everyday experience of getting work done.